Blog · Hiring · Comparison
Direct Hire vs. Contingency Recruiting: What Is the Difference?
"Direct hire" and "contingency" get used as if they are opposites. They are not. One describes the type of role you are filling. The other describes how you pay to fill it. Confusing the two is how firms end up overpaying for a search that is still open at day 90.
When a role has been open for a month, the question on the table is rarely "direct hire or contingency." It is "why is this taking so long, and what is it costing us." But understanding the terms matters, because the wrong pairing of role type and payment model is one of the most common reasons a search stalls.
This page explains what each term actually means, how they relate, what contingency really costs, and where a milestone-based placement model fits.
Direct Hire Describes the Role, Not the Fee
A direct hire is a permanent, full-time employee placed directly on your payroll. From day one the person works for you, not for a staffing agency, and there is no temp-to-perm conversion or co-employment arrangement in between. Direct hire is the opposite of temp staffing or contract placement, not the opposite of contingency.
BEG operates exclusively in the direct hire world. Every placement is a permanent employee on the client's payroll. BEG is not a staffing agency and does not place contract or temporary workers. The model is milestone-based permanent placement, delivered as an authorized reseller of isolved Job Placement Services.
Contingency Describes How You Pay
Contingency is a payment model. You engage a recruiter to find a candidate for a permanent direct hire role, and you pay a fee only if you hire someone they present. No placement, no fee. Because most direct hire searches are run on contingency, the two terms get blurred together. But you can fill a direct hire role through contingency, through retained search, or through a milestone-based model. The role is the same. Only the economics change.
| Factor | Contingency | Milestone-Based (BEG) |
|---|---|---|
| Role type | Permanent direct hire | Permanent direct hire |
| When you pay | Once, at the start date | At defined milestones |
| Typical fee | 20-25% of first-year salary | Roughly 50% less than contingency |
| Upfront cost | None | None |
| Average time to fill | 60-120+ days | 23-35 days |
| Fill rate | 40-60% | 86% |
| Candidate pool | Mostly active job seekers | Passive candidates included |
| Replacement guarantee | Varies, often limited | 45 days standard |
What Contingency Actually Costs
Contingency recruiting fees typically run 20-25% of the placed candidate's first-year salary, paid in full when the candidate starts. On a $150,000 hire, that is $30,000 to $37,500. On a $250,000 hire, it is $50,000 to $62,500. You pay nothing if no one is placed, which is the model's genuine strength. But the fee buys you a non-exclusive effort.
That structure has real consequences. Because the recruiter is only paid on a successful placement and your search is usually non-exclusive, your role competes for attention against every other client they are working. Harder or lower-fee roles get deprioritized. And because the fastest path to a fee is presenting candidates who are already on the market, contingency searches skew toward active job seekers rather than the passive, currently-employed candidates who tend to be the strongest hires.
The Slow-Search Problem
The talent supply context makes the speed gap worse. In legal, for example, law school enrollment is down roughly 30% since 2010, so the pool of mid-career candidates is structurally smaller and more of the best people are passive. They are employed, not on job boards, and they move quickly once they decide to consider a change. A hiring process that takes weeks to schedule interviews and approve an offer loses them to a faster firm.
This is the central failure mode of a slow contingency search. It is not that the recruiter cannot find anyone. It is that the model reaches the wrong half of the market and moves too slowly to close the right candidate when it does appear.
How long has your direct hire role been open?
If it has been more than 30 days, the contingency model may be the bottleneck. We will show you what the BEG milestone model looks like for your specific role.
How Milestone-Based Placement Fits
A milestone-based model keeps the part of contingency that firms like (no upfront retainer) and fixes the part that hurts (slow, non-dedicated, active-only sourcing). BEG fills permanent direct hire roles this way through isolved Job Placement Services:
- No upfront payment. Fees are tied to milestones, typically at candidate presentation and at start date.
- Roughly 50% less than standard contingency. The isolved platform reduces the manual sourcing overhead traditional recruiters price into their fee.
- Passive candidate access. The pipeline reaches currently-employed candidates who never see a job posting, not just people already searching.
- 23-35 day average fill time, 86% fill rate. A continuous sourcing pipeline rather than a reactive one.
- 45-day replacement guarantee. If the placed employee leaves within 45 days, BEG fills the role again at no additional fee.
If you are filling a permanent role and your current contingency search has passed 30 days, the role type is not the problem. The payment and sourcing model is. That is the part worth changing.
See what milestone placement looks like for your open role
Pick the role, answer a few quick questions, and see your placement quote on screen in 90 seconds.
Related Resources
Anthony helps hiring leaders evaluate recruiting models and fill permanent roles faster and at lower cost than traditional contingency search. BEG is an authorized reseller of isolved Job Placement Services.
From the blog