Applicant Tracking System · Compared
Tracking job applicants in spreadsheets and email costs you good candidates because neither one flags a stale application, schedules an interview, or alerts anyone when a hiring manager has gone silent for a week. An applicant tracking system closes every one of those gaps automatically.
Exact monthly and annual price - no call required
Side By Side
| Factor | Spreadsheets & email | isolved Attract & Hire, via BEG |
|---|---|---|
| Where applicants live | Scattered across inboxes, downloads folders, and someone’s personal tabs | One pipeline, every applicant, every role, in one place |
| Duplicate or lost resumes | Common once more than one person is hiring or forwarding | Automatically captured and deduplicated as they apply |
| Follow-up speed | Depends on someone remembering to check a folder | Automated alerts and status tracking keep candidates moving |
| Interview scheduling | Back-and-forth emails, double-bookings, manual calendar checks | Built-in scheduling tied to the candidate record |
| Compliance and audit trail | Scattered threads someone has to reconstruct after the fact | Timestamped record of every application and decision |
| Reporting | Manual, if it happens at all | Pipeline and source reporting built into the platform |
| Handoff to onboarding and payroll | Re-entering the same candidate data by hand | Flows directly into isolved onboarding and payroll |
What You Do Not See Happening
A resume sitting in a shared inbox looks the same whether it was seen an hour ago or forgotten for two weeks. Candidates do not know the difference either, and most assume the worst. By the time someone finally opens that email, the candidate has often already accepted another offer, a risk that grows the longer a role stays open, which per SHRM benchmarks is about 44 days on average. Spreadsheets and inboxes have no mechanism to flag that a candidate has gone quiet too long, so the loss happens without anyone noticing until the role is still open a month later.
Once more than one person is involved in hiring, the same candidate ends up forwarded to two inboxes, entered twice in the spreadsheet, or dropped entirely when a laptop gets a new download folder. There is no single source of truth, so nobody can say with confidence how many candidates are actually active for a role, or whether the best one already applied and got missed.
Every interview booked by email is a chain of back-and-forth: proposed times, calendar conflicts, a reschedule, a second reschedule. Multiply that by every candidate in every open role and the hiring manager’s week disappears into logistics instead of decisions. Candidates notice the friction too, and the ones with other offers on the table are the ones most likely to walk away from it.
When a hiring decision gets questioned, a spreadsheet and a scattering of email threads is a weak record to produce. And when the candidate finally accepts, someone has to retype their information into onboarding and payroll by hand, introducing the exact kind of manual error a growing company can least afford. What an ATS actually does covers how a real pipeline replaces every one of these manual steps.
Sources: SHRM research, time to fill and cost per hire benchmarks and BLS JOLTS, quits and labor turnover data.
Where BEG Fits
BEG resells, configures, and supports isolved Attract & Hire so your team stops chasing resumes across inboxes and spreadsheets. Applicants land in one pipeline, interviews get scheduled without the email chain, and a hire flows straight into isolved onboarding and payroll. See what is inside isolved Attract & Hire or check ATS pricing to see where it fits your budget.
Exact monthly and annual price - no call required
The Rest of the Stack
Back to the Applicant Tracking System overview for the full picture.
Managed payroll services take the new hire straight from your pipeline into a running payroll, every cycle handled.
See ATS pricing before you talk to anyone.
Questions
A spreadsheet is a static list you update by hand. An applicant tracking system like isolved Attract & Hire automatically pulls in applications, tracks each candidate through hiring stages, and keeps every resume, note, and message in one place.
For a single, rare opening, maybe. Once you have more than one role open at a time or more than a handful of applicants, spreadsheets and inboxes start losing candidates silently, and nobody notices until a good one has already accepted somewhere else.
Speed. Candidates who do not hear back within a few days often assume they were rejected and move on. A spreadsheet does not alert anyone when a follow-up is late, so slow response time becomes invisible until your best candidates are gone.
Yes. An ATS keeps a timestamped record of every application, communication, and hiring decision in one system, which is far easier to produce and defend than scattered email threads and a spreadsheet someone edited by hand.
BEG handles the setup. We configure isolved Attract & Hire to your roles and workflow, so your team moves from spreadsheets to a working applicant pipeline without building anything themselves.
Ready?
Answer a few questions, get your exact number in about 90 seconds. No call required, no commitment.
Exact monthly and annual price - no call required
